Lexember Day 31 - confront

This is an interesting example of a weird thing that happens to the Germanic geminate /rr/ cluster. You can see that it started out in Proto-Germanic as /rn/, which was then assimilated to /rr/ in Gothic. Now, if Griutungi had had ‑j‑ in the stem (**storrjan), it would have been degeminated to **storjan and nothing particularly interesting would have happened, so the addition of J must have happened after 700ᴀᴅ, when geminate intervocalic R was degeminated through metathesis, giving us *stroran, and before 800ᴀᴅ when said ‑j‑ would have caused I/J umlaut, giving us Old Valthungian *strørjan (which would likely have been spelt ⟨streorjan⟩). Later, a little before 1200ᴀᴅ, two instances of R within a single syllable of each other causes dissimilation. Usually the first R would change to L, but in cases where this is phonotactically impossible (/stl/ is not a valid sequence in this stage of the language), the second changes instead, giving us *strøljən and eventually Middle Valthungian strœljen.

It’s been a great Lexember this year, and I’ve really enjoyed seeing everyone’s lexica grow on Facebook, Instagram, BlueSky, Threads, Mastodon, and various other corners of the internet. I’ve also enjoyed spending some mental time muddling over some conundra that have bothered me for a while, and while I still haven’t solved all of my “L-Problems,” I’ve solved many of them and I have a plan to knock out the rest in the new year. Happy New Year—I hope 2025 is less bad than I think it’s going to be!

Lexember Day 30 - crunchy

Something weird happened to a lot of Valthungian nouns and adjectives starting around 600ᴀᴅ. (Well, at this time they weren’t so much Valthungian as maybe late Griutungi or pre-Old Valthungian.) Nouns and adjectives ending in voiced stops (that is, B, D, and G) went through some linguistic gymnastics, beginning with a series of voicing changes. Final ‑b(s) and ‑d(s) became ‑b(z) and ‑d(z), and eventually devoiced again to ‑f(s) and ‑þ(s), respectively. (E.g. halbs ‘half’ → halbz → halfs → haufs; bards ‘beard’ → bardz → barþs → braþs.) Final ‑gs, however, voiced to ‑gz, but didn’t devoice to **‑hs. This resulted in an awkward voiced ending that would eventually become /ʥ/ (e.g. dags ‘day’ → dagz → dagž → daǧ). 

This unaesthetic combination caused an avoidance of that particular combination in many words, especially in adjectives ending with the Germanic *‑Vgaz ending (cognate to English ‑y, German ‑ig, and Latin ‑icus), and it became common to replace this ending with its Latin counterpart, ‑icus (→ ‑ikus, e.g. maht-īgs ‘powerful’ → meaht-ikus → mǣtikus), or to convert it to a “long j-stem,” resulting in ‑agis or ‑ugis (e.g. manags ‘many’ → managis ‘crowded’ or grēdags ‘hungry’ → grēðugis).

By the way, something similar may have happened around late Middle English in verbs ending in -ȝen, whereby a number of very cromulent Old English verbs (stīgan, migan, hnigan, sigan, wigan) vanished from the language, leaving only stray archaic fragments like stile and sie.

In any case, some nouns and adjectives did their own weird things, like borrowing Latin ‑alis (e.g. unags ‘fearless’ → unagalis) or, in the case of today’s word, Latin ‑ceus.

Lexember Day 29 - silver, money

From afar it appears that some of the diachronic map is out of sequence; in particular, the Old Valthungian spelling of sivbvr looks like it ought to be representative of the earlier form shown at 700ᴀᴅ, and the Middle Valthungian spelling of the same looks more like the version from 950ᴀᴅ. That’s just how spelling convention works, though. Old Valthungian still spelled /ju/ as ⟨iv⟩ held over from an earlier diphthong /iu/, and Middle Valthungian still retained the “Palatalizing J” after all of the palatal consonants.

Lexember Day 28 - anvil

I have a migraine, so I don’t have anything interesting to say today. Sorry.

Lexember Day 27 - peninsula

OK, so what’s that first G doing there? 

Isn’t ‘island’ auge and not gauge? 

Doesn’t gauge mean ‘region’ or ‘area’? 

Well, yes to the last two questions, and the two words are not related. 

The mysterious G in the compound is left over from a very early sound change of w → ɡ, which tells us that this was probably a calque from Latin into Griutungi or Late East Germanic, entering the language sometime prior to 900ᴀᴅ as *nēhwuwawi or something similar. Any later, and we would likely have gotten something like **nēfurauge or **nēfauge.

As for why reconstructed Gritungi *awi doesn’t match reconstructed Gothic *awja, that’s a little more speculative, but one of the few differences between Gothic and reconstructed Griutungi is that the latter had some different mechanisms for how glides (W and J) function in words – particularly when they’re part of the ending – and in this case, the later forms of the word auge require that the Griutungi form came from an earlier form of *awijō rather than *awjō. It’s harder to say what the Gothic might have been, because there are no reflexes of the ‑awjō stems in the language, but based on how other similar words have evolved, it likely would not have taken on this “long-form” ending.

Lexember Day 26 - et cetera

I spent too much time playing with various graphics and font programs building that "&c" character that I don't have time to write anything interesting for the blog. Happy Boxing Day!

 

Lexember Day 25 - meow

Blīðna Žultin!

By the way, the noun and/or interjection form of meow is mjō, alternatively spelt miaw.

Lexember Day 24 - overthrow

Fun fact: If this were calqued directly into English, it would be “overcringe.”

So, I spent a little time re-thinking my verb template, and managed to make it way worse. Enjoy!

Lexember Day 23 - egg white, egg yolk

As promised in the slide, nothing interesting about this entry today. What might be a little interesting, though, to make it worth your time for clicking on my link and making it to the blog – thank you, by the way, for encouraging my nonsense! – is the development of the word ‘egg’ in the various Germanic languages. 

The Proto-Germanic word for egg was *aiją (depending on your preference of transcription), and the particular sequence of VijV (as well as VuwV) caused something called Verschärfung – also known as Holtzmann’s Law – to occur in North and East Germanic. In West Germanic, not much happened to it, and it eventually became Ei in German and Dutch, and, for a while, it was ey in English until it was eventually replaced in the 17th century by the Norse word which became our modern egg. There is a well-known Middle English text by William Caxton about the confusion of what eggs are called. “Sheffelde, a mercer, cam in to an hows and axed for mete and specyally he axyd after eggys, and the goode wyf answerde that she could speke no Frenshe. And the marchaunt was angry, for he also coude speke no Frenshe, but wolde have hadde egges; and she understode hym not. And thenne at laste a-nother sayd that he wolde have eyren. Then the good wyf sayd that she understod hym wel.”

Because of North Germanic Verschärfung, that intervocalic /jj/ became /ggj/, and was responsible for the Old Norse term egg, which was borrowed into northern English and gradually worked its way down. 

In East Germanic, meanwhile, Verschärfung instead caused intervocalic /jj/ to become /ddj/, and became Griutungi *addi. It was likely also *addi in Gothic, which eventually gave rise to Crimean Gothic ada.

Around the time of Old Valthungian, a geminate-deletion rule caused this sequence to break down to ahdi, and then in Middle Valthungian, the H was assimilated and the vowel lengthened giving rise to the modern form āde (ādi‑ in compounds). 

Lexember Day 22 - parking lot

Today’s word brought to you by a translation of a snowfall warning that popped up before yesterday’s storm. We got about 30cm of snow here in Halifax, which is a respectable amount for our first appreciable snowfall on the first day of winter. Today the sky is blue and the sun is shining! 

In case anybody’s curious, here’s the full translation (which is probably riddled with errors, because I haven’t bothered to proof-read it):

Snǣjudrusahwœuti

Skote Njuža
Fœri 51 stikim usgáliþ

Tœuža Garǣðiða

Garǣðiþ þo ferin at umbihreuvna wiðra bistœuðim wigalim mǣǧinþim.

Brutna: Umbigauge ǭk Mǣði Wiðragamǣnis Kanaðis

Bimēlins ǭk Unstadéginis

Garéþia Snǣjudrusis: 15 unþ 30 cm.

Gastáþs: Skote Njuža, Ogumaland

Tīðirynia: Af anþanǣča hisdágis unst·ēvunþa lǭgisdagis.

Inmēlinis: Snǣjus gengiþ vreðna īsastǣnulas ǣða rigna bróginis lǭgisdagis  in gœ̄žim ǭstram þis prǭginčis, hwa minžiþ garéþin snǣjudrusis.

Gustas droðarǭstaðra iži kwimnaþ miþ snǣjua mag tīmaro sǣjumāt minziþ tœuǧin in snǣjua fjuknaðatma.

Sčurins þlœ̄ro, swǣjo þrigatǣna, wigas, stǣgas, rǣðafuiðu, mag angunan nū snǣjuljuðis. 

Snǣjudrusahwœutins gitnaþ usgáliþ þeni sjǣjudrus inmēlivuiðra gitiþ usbíðna.

Lexember Day 21 - solstice

I didn’t even realize that this word wasn’t already in my lexicon – I had names for the winter and summer solstices, but not “solstice” itself. In the process, I also discovered the archaic English term sunstead. 

Anyway, Happy Solstice and Glad Yuletide to you all!

Lexember Day 20 - jugful

Ik bringa hǣma rœčifylin wīnis gā du žultina froðu þulan anmœuǧin þ·ufþlœusin. Þā genǧik wisna inča hēþia mīna.

‘I’ve brought a jugful of wine home for the winter holidays to endure encourage the good cheer. I’ll be in my room.’

Lexember Day 19 - double

Twīfauþs is the result of a rather unusual merger of two similar words with similar meanings. It’s almost not worth commenting on, except that the two words have completely different etymologies. In Early Modern Valthungian, these were two distinct words – twīfnas and twižafauþs. The twi has a semi-common source: twi- is a common Germanic prefix for ‘two’, while twī (with a long vowel) is part of a root form of the same word. The -f- of both words is completely coincidental, however... see below. (This adjective does not have a comparative or superlative form, but I didn’t feel like futzing around with the formatting to erase them.)

Lexember Day 18 - malice

 Today's lexembreme brought to you by Elphaba and pals.

Lexember Day 17 - now

Just a fun neologism-ex-contractio today. 

Lexember Day 16 – extract

This is the word you will find in your kitchen cabinet on the vanilla or almond extract.

“But Jamin,” you might wonder, “isn’t -ins limited to verbal nouns? Isn’t this an actual substantive noun?” 

To which might answer, “Yup! Language is freakin’ weird, man.” Yes, we would normally expect a weak īn-stem noun for the substantive form (giving us **ustréni) but that’s just… not what it is. I dunno what to tell you. It can also be a verbal noun, though (“extraction”).

In Valthungian cuisine, you will also hear a non-descript “extract” called for in recipes. (My own patnabran recipe calls for a full tablespoon of ustrénins!) This is a little bit like curry or dumplings, in that every Valthungian grandmother has a very specific recipe, and they’re all different, and each one swears that hers is the only “correct” one. My own Valthungian grandmother taught me the “prime number rule” for making ustrénins, and I’m not going to share it with you here, because she said she would haunt me, but it involves prime numbers of parts of vanilla, lemon, almond, and blood orange extracts, plus Grand Marnier and a couple of other secret ingredients. It’s definitely the best I’ve tried. The bottle on the left is the ustrénins from my own kitchen; I just refilled it! (And that’s what Valthungian cursive looks like, but that’s for another day…)

Lexember Day 15 - bear

Remember, remember, the Ides of Lexember! We’re halfway there, folks! 

I didn’t have room today to include the full etymology, so that’s your blog bonus today.

Wauðuskīča is made up of the word wauðus ‘forest’ (← MV wawðus ← OV vavdyus ← Grt. *walþus ← PGmc *walþuz) and the verb skītna ‘to shit’ (← MV scîtɴ ← OV *skijtan ← Grt. *skītan ← PGmc *skeitaną) with weak agentive ending ‑ia (← MV ‑ja ← OV ‑ja ← Grt. ‑ja ← PGmc ‑jô), which causes palatalization of the final consonant of the verb (ergo, skītia → skīča).

Lexember Day 14 - anthropology

As indicated on the slide, Valthungian has two suffixes that readily translate to ‘-ology’, but that translation can be more complicated in reverse. 

-wīsi is a field of study or an area of knowledge, e.g. lēkiwīsi ‘medicine, physiology’

-wite is a practice or profession, e.g. lēkiwite ‘medicine, medical practice’ – particularly a specialized medical practice like cardiology or neurology.

And wīte is unrelated to both of the above. It means ‘punishment’, so don’t try to substitute it in if you can’t remember which ‑ology you need! (Lēkiwīte isn’t a word, because we live in a civilised – usmētina – society!) 

So, keep your wits about you. Ahem. 

Some other examples:

• lēkiwīsi ‘study of medicine’
• lēkiwite ‘practice of (specialized) medicine’
• kwižiwīsi ‘biology’
• reðawīsi ‘geology’
• sinigawīsi ‘archaeology’
• tunglawīsi ‘astronomy’
• ǧužawīsi ‘zoology’
• hǣliwīsi ‘medicine, healing’
• hǣliwite ‘medical practice, naturopathy’
• līkawīsi ‘physics’
• rastawīsi ‘linguistics’
• stōmawīsi ‘chemistry’
• tungawīsi ‘grammar’
• forgāftiwīsi ‘history’
• wrotiwīsi ‘botany’
• rīkiwite ‘poitics’
• brǭstawite ‘beer-brewing’
• wiðrawīsi ‘meteorology, study of weather’
• wiðrawite ‘meteorology, weather forecasting’

Lexember Day 13 - thirteen times

Today, in honour of the 13ᵗʰ day of Lexember, I bring you an old word with a new twist. 

The word is missing from the Gothic corpus, but there is sufficient evidence to believe it was either *þritaihun or *þrijataihun, the equivalents of which were likely both present in Griutungi as *þritehun and *þrijatehun. But Gothic also had an alphabetic number system, inspired by the Greek, and in this system, the numeral 13 was rendered as ·ig· and this system continued to be used throughout Old Valthungian. In Middle Valthungian, likely starting jocularly, certain numerals which formed pronounceable words began to be “spoken” in place of their linguistic equivalents, and ig was one of them. 

Word games also developed with some of the numbers, and we also see the reverse process happening, resulting in words like fiðrahunda þrižatǣn – literally ‘four hundred thirteen’ – coming to be a slang term for ‘road, highway’, as 413 in Gothic numerals is ·wig·, which is also the accusative of wiǧ ‘road’.

For a while in Middle Valthungian, three words for ‘13’ existed in somewhat free variation: þrizjatæn being the most “correct,” þrîtæn the most common, and ig the most informal. In the transition to Early Modern Valthungian, however,  a metrical change took place in the language and caused many words with two adjacent stressed syllables to get an epenthetic vowel. Indeed, this led to the brief existence of “þrîatæn,” but it quickly fell out of use leaving only the formal þrižatǣn and the informal ig. It wasn’t long before someone smushed the two together, and þrigatǣn eventually became the most popular of the three options. (The other two are still in use, but þrigatǣn is vastly preferred.)

In case that all sounds like a lot to swallow, note that something very similar also happened to nineteen, where the very awkward-sounding njuntǣn or njunatǣn and iþ merged to give us niðatǣn; in this case, however, njunatǣn has fallen out of use completely.

The final element of this story is the suffix ‑þis, which from a distance looks like a simple ordinal or genitive, but is no such thing at all. It is derived from the Griutungi *þīhs (Gothic þeihs), which also exists as the independent word þīfs ‘time, occurrence’, which supplanted earlier *sinþam ‘times’ among the adverbialized numbers.

Anyway, Happy Friday the 13ᵗʰ of Lexember!

Lexember Day 12 - tower

I’m very tired. Practically unconscious already. I don’t even know how I’m still typing. If you clicked on the link from today’s Lexember to see what nuggets of interesting etymology I put on the blog that I didn’t have room to include on the slide, I’m afraid you’ve wasted a click. Sorry about that.

Lexember Day 11 - stovetop

 There's not a whole lot to say about this one. Just a word I invented and liked. 

Lexember Day 10 - imperfect

Imperfect… as evidenced by my spacing and formatting today. I tried to update my template to be suitable for adjectives. It is not.

Edit: This is not the name of the grammatical construct sometimes called “imperfect” in various languages. That particular tense (which doesn’t exist in Valthungian) is called the forgāft fortrampa – something like the “past continuative.”

Lexember Day 09 - spice rack

Sometimes, despite our best efforts, a perfectly cromulent word with a perfectly valid derivation just comes out sounding silly, and this is one of them.

In other news about this word (and some related terms), I may have accidentally implied that East Germanic may have conflated the verbs sūpaną ‘to slurp’ and sūpōną ‘to soak’, which they surely did not, but the Valthungians definitely did. Oops. I’m not mad about it – these are the sort of happy conlanging accidents that I revel in, especially if they’re plausible, which I think this one is (as long as I can establish that it happened after Middle Valthungian when *sûpon would have still had the vowel of the Class 2 weak verbs).

Finally, in Lexember news, what are your thoughts about the new etymology table? I wanted to make it a little less “texty,” but I’m not sure how I like this format. Does it make sense?

PS – another total accident, but bingo for ‘rub’ (from bingun) is my favourite new accidental Valthungian word, and mimžabingo ‘meat-rub’ just brings me some kind of strange joy.

Lexember Day 08 - weeping willow

In case you’re wondering, yes, I did translate the whole song, but there are still a few awkward phrasings in there that I’d like to work through before I try to sing Valthungian country music at anyone.

1615 / 2025 Valthungian Calendar

It’s that time of year again! I just finished work on next year’s Valthungian/Gregorian calendar. If you’ve seen previous calendars, there isn’t a lot of change to talk about this year… Same 7 days of the week (in their abbreviated forms), same 24 months. There are only two differences I can think of from last year’s calendar, all of which centre on the recent L-changes to the language:

• The minor month Blate, due to said sound change, is now Maute (Mautimēnaþs)
• The hlava- element found in the cross-quarters is now hauva, ergo
• Hauvawastra 
• Hauvasumbra
• Hauvahravist
• Hauvawintrus

Nota bene: All astronomical calculations are in Atlantic time, so they should be pretty useless for just about everyone but me.

(Download the full PDF Calendar here.)

Edit: Just kidding, those are still the old day names. Maybe one day I'll upload a new, corrected version, but today is not that day. In keeping with the short month names, which usually use an abstract neuter i-stem ending, the days now also have short forms, mostly using abstract neuter u-stem endings:

• sǭgilo
• mēno
• tījo
• wœuðnio
• þīfo
• frižo
• lǭgo

Lexember Day 07 – to resound

Today’s word is brought to you by a bunch of those “L-Shattering” sound changes interacting within a single paradigm. The word itself, deriving from Proto-Germanic *hellaną (whence also German hellen), is fairly unremarkable aside from being phonaesthetically related to a host of other “-ell” words related to sound such as skellaną (→ OE scellan ‘clang’), hlōaną (→ low, cf. cattle), skallijaną (→ shill), gellaną (→ yell), bellaną (→ bellow and German bellen ‘bark’), and possibly even related to ‘call’ and ‘clambor’. But the really nifty bit here is how a number of distinctive sound changes are showcased in this tiny class 3 strong verb.

First, the basic forms – if you’ve been steeped in Germanic linguistics for decades like some of us, I’m talking about the “First Principal Part,” which consists of the infinitive and gerund, the present indicative and subjunctive, and the imperative forms – in this case: šul /ɕul/. This comes from MV hsjul /ʃjul/ ← OV hivl /hjul/ ← Griutungi hill ← PGmc hell. To really break it down for you, here are the important changes going on:

• hill → hiwl (Geminate sonorants go through some stuff. /ll/ becomes /wl/ before a vowel.)
• hiwl → hjul (This is a general change of /iw/→/ju/ that took place prior to the Old Valthungian era, though it was still written as ⟨iv⟩ in OV.)
• hjul → ʃjul (A change just prior to Middle Valthungian where /hj/ → /ʃj/, possibly with an intermediate /ç(j)/. Written in various ways in MV (hj, sj, hsj, shj, &c) now usually standardized as ⟨hsj⟩ to distinguish it from ⟨sj⟩ /ʃj/ from a different process.)
• ʃjul → ɕul (Palatalized consonants followed by /j/ lose the /j/, and at some point become true palatals, though not necessarily both at the same time.)

A little odd, maybe, but not too weird so far. But moving on the Second Principal Part: The preterit singular: haul /hau̯l/ ← MV hawl (/idem/) ← OV havl (/idem/) ← Grt. hall. There’s really not much going on here at all aside from the same Geminate Sonorant change from above. This one is remarkable only for its complete lack of doing anything interesting. The only other thing to note is that the second person singular, hault, is an analogous form: It should have avoided the initial Geminate Sonorant rule because it was followed by a consonant, but hallt → *halt was probably quickly assimilated to match haul.

Finally, the Third and Fourth Principal Parts are the same (as in most Class 3 strong verbs), but they get some extra weirdness from the L-Shattering Times. (The 3PP consists of the preterit plural and the past subjunctive, and the 4PP is the past participle.)

Here we start out simply enough with Griutungi hull, but the Geminate Sonorant rule has a twist when the preceding vowel is /u/, so:

• hull → hujl
• hujl → hwil (Normally, the new-found diphthong would remain /uj/ but in this case it interacts with preceding /h/, and /h-ui̯/ gets reanalyzed as /hu̯-i/. Though it is not reflected in Valthungian’s marginally more popular Romanization, ⟨hu⟩ is distinct from ⟨hw⟩ in the Valthungian script, and this form has become ⟨hw⟩.) 
• hwil → xwil (This change was never reflected in writing.)

The final jank in this putative frankenverb is that if you are familiar with Valthungian verbs at all, you may have noticed a lack of Valthungian’s distinctive “Metathetical Unpacking,” as the kids like to call it, which is where a lot of infinitives, participles, gerunds, and various other inflections tend to “flip” their final syllables, so you might be expecting **šulna, **šulnaþ, **šulnas, **šulnaþs, and so on. There’s not much to say about that except that that particular process is blocked by L in another L-Rebellion more than a thousand years after the previous one.

Lexember Day 06 - moonlight or maybe vodka

Most strong nouns add the stem vowel to the end of the first element, but weak nouns usually add -in-. There are a few examples where a masculine or neuter first element will add -a- or a feminine element will add just -i-, but there are usually some awkward historical reasons for this. In the case of this particular compound, though, the N in -in- shifts to M before the following B. (And, of course, the same thing happens when the second element of a compound begins with M or P.)

Speaking of compounds, another fun example appears in the related terms: The word for ‘alcohol’ is miðurāma, comprised of miðo ‘mead’ and āma ‘spirit’ – i.e. “Spirit of Mead,” but where does that R come from, you ask? When two compounds come together with two irreconcilable vowels, R is added for liaison, like in skātarǣftrins ‘invoice’ (skāta ‘coin’ + ǣftrins ‘request’). There are some other phonological factors at work that I’ll spare you for the moment, like not allowing two stressed syllables to occur in a row in compounds, but let’s save that for another day.

Lexember Day 05 - to transplant

Today’s word is brought to you by my guilt as I gaze across the room at an Alocasia that’s been giving me the stink-eye for a few weeks now. Nothing too interesting to note today except that I’ve adapted my template for verbs and tried to leave space for an example sentence, which I’d overlooked in the last few days. This word also contains another of those “L-Shattering” changes: Muiða is similar to yesterday’s wuila, but in a slightly different order; in this case: PGmc. muldō → Grt. mulda → muwða → mujða (OV spelling mvidya) → muiða.

Lexember Day 04 - cotton

For blogular purposes, I think it’s worth talking about some of the disparate sound changes that have led to this word, beyond just the few I’ve mentioned in the etymology.

I’ll start with the easy one (already hinted at): Why the orthography change from 〈ju〉 to 〈eu〉? In early modern Valthungian, there’s a new rule that kicks in causing /ju/ to lower after liquids; more specifically, /rju/ → [rɛʊ̯] and /lju/ → [ljɛʊ]. (Why does /l/ get to keep its palatal glide? That’s a story for another day!) In most cases, this change isn’t reflected in writing, but /ɛʊ̯/ does already exist phonemically from other processes (usually related to umlaut), so when collapsing the unwieldy /trjuˈwujla/ into something less tangy, it became common to change the spelling accordingly, and by the and of the first half of the 20th century, it was standard.

The spicier change, though, happened 1200 years earlier in the period leading up to Old Valthungian. Remember on Lexember Day 1, when I mentioned some “L-changes” that I hadn’t publicly codified yet? This is one of them. Sometime around 700ᴀᴅ, a Series of Unfortunate Events occur, first to the geminate consonants, and subsequently to the liquids. First, /Vll/ and /Vrr/ undergo an implausible sort of metathesis, becoming /lVl/ and /rVr/, respectively. Some weird things later happen to R, but we’ll catch up with them another time. Meanwhile, this is the first stage of a rule I’m calling “L-shattering,” a 300-ish year process during which something slightly different happens to almost every conceivable phonological combination involving /l/. So first, /wulla/ → /wlula/, as described above. Next, /lul/ becomes /uil/, leading to /wuila/ (Old Valthungian vvila). Not much actually happens after that to this combination in particular, but a number of different things happen to other L-having segments.

It is probably also worth mentioning, if you’ve bothered to read this far – first of all, thank you! – and also the final back-and-forth of the ending of trio… So, a good 2000 years ago, during the formation of East Germanic, the neuter ending /wã/ lost its vowel to a final unstressed vowel deletion rule, leaving /triw/. By Old Valthungian, this /iw/ had come to be /ju/, despite spelling it 〈iv〉. In Middle Valthungian, final unstressed /u/ became /o/, but I obviously have a typo in the image, so please ignore that because I’m not regenerating it now for the sake of a single O. And finally, an early Modern Valthungian rule vocalizes glides before final vowels, resulting in /trjo → tri.o/, shortly before the aforementioned shift of /rju/ to /rɛʊ̯/, so the standalone form does not have this change (trio /ˈtri.o/, but dative trjuga /ˈtrɛʊ̯.ɡa/).

There’s some other stuff to be said about compounds, but that’s enough for today. Happy Lexembering!

Lexember Day 03 - hemisphere

Today’s word isn’t new, but it’s been reconfigured because of that liquid shifting rule I mentioned: Heretofore it was **hreuvahlava, which was more annoying to say. Those sequential diphthongs are still a little awkward to say, but I’ll get over it.

Fun fact about this (and may three or four other words): hauva itself (‘half’) is a weak noun, but in compounds it is usually strong. I don’t know why this is, but the answer is most likely that I wasn’t paying attention somewhere, and now it’s permanent. (If it is my mistake, though, those are the sort of mistakes that I like to bake in to make the eyelids of future etymologists twitch.) (They know what they did.)

Lexember Day 02 - kiwi (fruit)

Since it looks like I’m going to do this, I spent some time last night futzing around with my formatting to try to make a nice (perfectly square) template for my Lexember entries this month. I’m not quite sure I’ve succeeded, and I have no idea what will happen if my word of the day is not a noun, but we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it. For now, have a kiwi!

kenināde n.st.n.ja ‘kiwi (fruit)’

Is it Lexember again already?

 I woke up this morning to discover that Lexember has crept up on me once again. And once again, all of the old arguments of “it’s a bad time of year for this,” “I’m probably just going to run out of steam after a few weeks,” “…but the holidays…” “but I haven’t got a language in mind to work on…” Meh. No angst this year. I’ll join in and play along, and when it gets overwhelming, I’ll stop. I might skip a day here and there. No use working myself into knots about it.

After a great deal of thought – well, as great a deal as I’ve had time to think since the first #Lexember hashtag floated by on my screen this morning and I realized what month it is – I’ve decided to avoid working on Europic, because everyone is probably sick of seeing it, and I’ll be working on it throughout the month anyway without making it a part of Lexember. Gothic Romance isn’t any better off than it was 350 days ago. If I were smart, I’d work on Ox-Yew (Adzaay), because I’m going to need to get it beefed up soon so I can start using it to influence future Europic, but… I don’t wanna. 

I think instead I’m going to spend some quality time with Valthungian, which I’ve been ignoring for a while now. Before I got too wrapped up in Europic (and descendants), I had implemented a liquid  exflunctification rule in Old Valthungian that rejiggernated a lot of words containing L’s and R’s, but I never sat down and sorted them all out properly, so even though there are a lot of words that aren’t really “new,” they’ve definitely never been seen before in their current pokéform.

With that in mind, here’s new Valthungian word for Lexember Day 1, updated for new L rules…

šuvaþljúþ, n. vowel.