Showing posts with label Proto-Germanic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proto-Germanic. Show all posts

Monday, April 1, 2024

What's in a Name? - Extended Remix

I often hear the question “How do you name your conlangs?” and I have answered parts of it in various fora, but I wanted to put together a comprehensive history here. The short answer is that there is no one source, and often I just don’t bother until I have been working on a project for a while. I’ll try to keep this chronological, so that in the future I will be able to edit it as I add more. It can also serve as a nice overview of my conlanging timeline.

1994: The conlangs I created never got far enough to have names. But one should never talk about their first and second conlangs in polite company anyway. The first conlang I created—okay, the first six or eight words I scribbled down with the intention of creating a language from them—was entirely a priori, but I don’t remember anything about it other than that na was the animate definite article: I had had a brilliant idea about nouns, and I subsequently “invented” animacy; later I was gutted to learn that it already existed in quite a lot of languages. My first and most devastating anadew

The second language still exists as snippets of terrible poetry, but most of the actual nouns, verbs, and adjectives seem to be made up randomly of French, German, and Russian, with some Hebrew, Greek, and Italian for good measure. The word ‘whatever’ was shto zhamei. I’m sure I thought that that was very clever.

1995: Dlatci /ˈdla.ʧi/. The name just came to me. I enjoyed the unusual sound (for someone who only had experience with European languages at the time) of the initial consonant cluster. I can’t remember how I initially spelled the affricate – I don’t think it was ⟨tc⟩, but it’s been ⟨Dlatci⟩ for as long as I can remember now. Dlatci has undergone several revisions over the years, and the current one is “Dlatci v5.1.”

1999: Latinovesa. An early Romance auxlang we are not going to talk about. It was also briefly called “Latinova,” but I later decided to add the -esa ending, which indicates language names. This was still before I had ever heard of any conlangers aside from Tolkien, though I later discovered that there were at least a dozen other Romance auxlangs called “Latinova.”

2000: Northeadish /nɔrˈθi.dɪʃ/, (endonym Druðþþᵫ̄ðesc [dɾʊˈθyːðɛsk]). Initially my Germanic answer to Latinovesa, but I couldn’t compel it into being an auxlang, because I loved my ablauting strong verbs too much! Of course, I had no concept of auxlangs as compared to artlangs at the time; this was during an era when conlangers were just starting to discover each other on the internet and find out that they weren’t the only ones out there with this “secret vice,” and at that time, it was hard to conceive of creating a conlang for any purpose other than to be used in a fantasy novel or as an auxiliary language. The original name was not Northeadish, and this was also years before it occurred to me that a decent language should have a proper exonym as well as an endonym: Initially it was called Tsœxisca [ˈʦœçɪskə]. I have no idea where that name came from, but I think it was just a series of sounds that I liked that I thought represented the language. (Almost none of those sounds still exist in the language now.) At some point, initial ts was no longer licit in the language, and since I was on an Old Norse kick at the time, I renamed it Norðisca [ˈnɔɾðɪskə]. Later I had the Brilliant Idea™ to call it Theadish/Þᵫ̄ðesc, from *þeudiskǭ (the same root that gave us Deutsch and Dutch). It wasn’t long before I discovered that there were at least half a dozen “Theadish” languages on the internet at the time (along with variants like Theedish, Thiedish, and Theidish). At this point I just decided to stick “north” back onto the beginning, and the Northeadish exonym was complete. The endonym, however, had a few more sound shifts to undergo, and Norþᵫ̄ðesc became Nurðþ-þᵫ̄ðesc and eventually Druðþþᵫ̄ðesc. And so it remains, though I haven’t worked on it since Valthungian took over the Germanic part of my conlanging brain. I think it counts as abandoned by now, though I’ve rolled a lot of what I love about it into Middle Valthungian.

2000: Maltcégj /malˈʧɛɡʒ/. I often tell people that “I literally pulled letters out of a hat,” and I’m not quite sure why I started saying that, because it’s not true. It was a legal-sized inter-departmental mailing envelope—you know the kind with holes and a red string that you can “seal” it with by winding it around two paper disks by the flap? I guess that just doesn’t roll off the tongue quite as easily. But once I had got the basics of the phonology sketched out, I wrote out all my phonemes on scraps of paper, threw them in the envelope, and then pulled out a handful and tried to arrange it in a way that was vaguely pronounceable. At the time I documented it, poorly, here. I’m pretty sure that’s originally where Maltcégj’s signature [ɡʒ] cluster came from. This was a period in my conlanging life when I didn’t really understand the concept of “less is more,” and I was under the impression that if you could pronounce a particular cluster or sequence, it wouldn’t be fair not to include it in the language. FF’s sake, the word for ‘fish’ is ðbrukc [ðbɾukʃ]. Anyway, the name hasn’t changed much over the years aside from a few minor orthographic variations: For a while [ɛ] was ɛ, and that made the mandatory stress-marking diacritics time-consuming to type on a regular basis. Also, [ʃ] went through a number of iterations including ж and even § before I finally reassigned /k/ to k and assigned /ʃ/ to the now-freed-up c.

2001: Something called “Fricative Chant Project.” I dunno, man. It’s just a few pages of lists of syllables. Not a plosive in sight. I think this was the abandoned project that taught me that languages without stops end up feeling a bit “floppy.”

2002: Baraq /baˈɾaq/. For the record, this was a few years before I’d ever heard of Mr. Obama: no relation. I have no idea where the name came from, but I later created/imagined a language family called Baraqesh, of which Maltcégj and Dlatci were also a part. There were so many vowels, and so many declensions. It was really ridiculous.

2002: Bálabhádh /baːlaˈvaːð/. My first collablang, with the incomparable Zeke Fordsmender and William Annis. This was an adorable little language, and I’m still quite fond of the orthography we came up with for it. As with most collablangs, we all got distracted and sort of wandered away before very long, though I like to say it collapsed under the weight of its own pronouns: We had had the idea that there should be a complete array of pronouns to describe every gender and sexuality on the spectrum, and this was still back when there were really only four letters in “GLBT.” I think we made it up to something like 21 first-person pronouns before it caved in. (These days I lean towards completely non-gendered pronouns. It makes life a lot simpler: I recommend it.)

2002: Bruga (/ˈbruɡa/, I guess). Aside from the name, a short phonology, a list of all possible syllables, and a handwritten present tense conjugation scrawled in a notebook, nothing ever really came of this one. In fact, I didn’t even remember that it existed until I found it while compiling this list.

2003: ɮaxu /ˈɮa.xu/. An early stab at a philosophengelang. 49 cases. 63 screeves. No idea where the name came from. A special declension for prime numbers. I don’t even want to talk about it. It was a lot.

2004: Iatu Nukta Amat /ˈijatu ˈnukta aˈmat’/. I never did much with this conlang, but the name was shouted at me by some demonic force in a nightmare. This was later conflated with something I called the “4x4 weekend challenge,” in which I had 44 hours to create a minilang using 16 phonemes (4 stops, 4 fricatives, 4 sonorants, 4 vowels). That itself was an extension of an earlier 3x3 challenge, which never had a name and is probably lost to history, though some of the “3-based” elements later found a home in Ox-Yew.

2008: Thydge /θyʤ/. A long-since-abandoned South Germanic companion to Northeadish. I can’t even find my notes about it, but I remember thinking that it must be what Langobarden sounded like. Not what it actually sounds like, but what I thought it might have sounded like before ever hearing it.

2010: Valthungian /valˈθʊn.ʤi.ən/, (endonym Grējutungiška [ɡrajuˈtuŋɡiɕka] or So Grējuga Tunga [so̞ ˈɡrajuɡa ˈtuŋɡa]). This started out as Gutish/Gytiska, which was a horrible name from the start, but the logical diachronic development of Gutiskō ‘Gothic’. There’s a whole story about when and why I changed it in 2018, here: The Grey Tongue. Tl;dr, the important take-away here is that the exonym is an English mispronunciation of a Latinate mispronunciation of the name of the wrong tribe of Ostrogoths (the Walthungi, cf. Tervingi), while the endonym is a Valthungian rebracketing of a different tribe, Greut-ungōs (“the Gravel-people,” perhaps referring to the rocky shores of the Black Sea) as Grēw-tungōs (“Grey-Tongues”). I’ve been toying with the idea of changing it again, slightly, to “Valthingian” or “Valthengian,” for reasons I won’t go into, but I think it’s probably permanent now. In addition to Valthungian/Grējutingiška, there are also historic forms – Old and Middle Valthungian (nothing too interesting there, name-wise), and Griutungi/Griutuggō (basically a dialect of Gothic which is how Greutungi would have been rendered in Gothic).

2014: Brooding /ˈbrudɪŋ/ (endonym: Brooding [ˈbru.dɪŋ] ‘Related to the Brood/Family’ or Baus Broodingee [baʊ̯s ˈbru.dɪ.ŋi] ‘Language of that which is Related to the Brood/Family’) This is the first conlang I worked on that I was not directly involved in naming, and the first “professional” conlang I worked on. I didn’t create Brooding – it was originally created in 2012 by V. Hamilton for the Riddlesbrood Touring Theatre Company; I “adopted” it and have been expanding it ever since. The origin, though, is interesting and worth mentioning here: I’m not sure where the name “Riddlesbrood” came from – I believe it was just imagined by the troupe’s director, Ryan Long (a.k.a. Clyde Riddlesbrood), but the name and logo were both elements that Vee took into account while creating the language, and ‘Riddlesbrood’ riduhlzbrood ended up meaning something akin to “family of mystery,” from riduhz ‘mystery’ + -l- (possessive) + brood ‘family, troupe, tribe, social unit’. The language itself was named for Brood ‘family’ + -ing ‘relation/association’, or Baus ‘language’ + Brood ‘family’ + -ing ‘relation/association’ + -ee (adjectivizer).

2014: Nurbia Nacura. This was a very short-lived project that still makes me a little anxious to talk about. It was never really a proper conlang or even an attempt at one, but rather a sort of cipher I created to convert Latin or Latin-sounding words into something unrecognizable that still had the same general phonaesthetics of a generic Romance language. The name “Nurbia Nacura” is literally just Lingua Latina run through that cipher. I hadn’t got far beyond just setting up the formula, though, when I posted a little blurb about it on social media, and some jerk immediately commented, “Wow, so cool. I’m going to use this!” and proceeded to rip off the idea wholesale. I wouldn’t even have minded if they wanted to do something similar, but they literally took the entire formula, ran a Latin word-list through it, and then started posting about “their” new conlang. It made me feel kind of gross and violated. You know that meme about English chasing other languages into dark alleys and beating them up for their grammar? That’s right, I felt like I was lingui-mugged.

2018: Grayis /ˈɡreɪ̯.əs/ (endonym: Grayis [ɡrä.jɪs]). Another name I didn’t create, directly, but it’s an interesting story. I had posted something on social media about Valthungian (a.k.a. “The Grey Tongue,” as described above) and I was subsequently contacted by a game designer who noticed the post because the name was similar to one of six alien races he had created, the Grayis Kin; he needed a language for them, and subsequently hired me to create it. The game, Pilots of Gallaxia, was eventually released in 2020, and as far as I can tell, had no trace of the language in it, but in case you play it, just know that they do have a language out there!

2019: Ox-Yew (endonym: Adzaay [adɮaːtɬ’]). When I initially created the language, I used all of the Latin letters except for E, O, W, X, and Y, so I put them together and made up a crazy back-story about the Ox-Yew people, or the People of Cows and Trees.The language got a slight redirection in 2023 when I decided to transplant its native speaker base from somewhere vaguely around Siberia to an alien planet which serves as the setting for a novel I’m writing. At some point, I will probably use it to influence Rupesh (below).

2019: Veonic /veɪ̯ˈjɑ.nɪk/ (endonym: Veionasi (Uthral) [ve.joˈna.si (uˈθral)]). Another professional conlang; not really allowed to say much about it other than “Veonic” was the author’s working name for it and the Veiona-si of the endonym is the genitive of the same. Uthral just means ‘language’. 

2019: Iskan /ˈɪskən/ (endonym: Iskān (Shaskua) [is.kaːn (ˈʃas.kua̯)]) Another professional conlang, for author Gavin Hamilton. A nice little Greek-meets-Hebrew-flavoured language I created for an upcoming novel. The author had already created a number of names in the language; Iskā is the name of the ancient homeland of the protagonist culture; Iskān is the genitive thereof. Shaskua means ‘language’. It readily ported over into English as “Iskan.”

2020: Zjenavi (endonym, Zjenav [ʒeˈnav]) Another professional conlang, for author Luca-Fabio Di Franco. The author had already created a number of names in the language, and there was a lot of dithering about the exact name of the language itself, and I’m not sure the dithering is done; as far as I know, the name is currently fixed at Zjenav (it was formerly Zjenaviv), with Zjenav-i as its exonym. It is the language of the Rahavahi people.

2020: Modern Standard Imperial (endonym: Drikva Yakke [ˈdɾi.kva ˈjak.ʃe]) The first of seven languages I’ve created (or am still in the process of creating) for graphic novelist Anthony Gutierrez. Many of the names of his languages have exonyms already as they are translated into the graphic novel The Lost Children; the endonyms have been a little trickier to come up with, but Imperial (or, officially Modern Standard Imperial) was easy: drikva ‘language’ and yakke ‘of the Empire’. It is also known colloquially as mekra lekron ‘the common tongue’, because every evil empire needs to have a Common Tongue that the Common People speak! (NB: The writing system is called kuggi yakke ‘Script of the Empire’. One does not say exactly “I speak Modern Standard Imperial,” but rather kvepa yakke gvida meu: “I say the words of the Empire.”)

2020: Lezyalu (Okau) [ˈleʒalu (oˈkaw)] A language I created for author and musician Ty Sheetz. It doesn’t really have an exonym. There’s not much I’m able to say about it yet except that the full name means ‘Language of the Holy Ones’, and it’s very cool and I’m very happy with how it turned out and I can’t wait to be able to tell folks about it when the book comes out!

2021: Gothic Romance (and periphery) (endonym: Gotica Romana) Officially, the backstory here is that Valthungian was originally slated to be “What if the Goths who sacked Rome in 410ᴀᴅ just kept speaking Gothic and it continued to evolve within the Romance Sprachbund,” but it ended up going in a very different direction, and Gothic Romance was my attempt to complete that original goal. But mostly it was born of puns. Not only do I have an immediate audience of every member of the Dark and Spooky Nation who would want to learn it (especially because it really does sound kind of dark and spooky in a lovely way), but its direct ancestor on the Germanic side is called Bad Romance, and Romance Novelle on the Italic side. I’ll show myself out, but there’s some background here. I continue to fool around with this language every few months, and it’s far from ready for primetime (as you can see from this past Lexember), but one day soon it will be a deliciously dark and sumptuous language.

2021: Northern ~ Alder’mane /ˈɑldərˌmeɪ̯n/ (endonym: Alderxmanuvgöm [al.der..ˈman.uvˌɡɤm] ‘Language of the Cradle’ ~ Dhënuvgöm [ˈðøn.uvˌɡɤm] ‘Language of the North’) This is the second of seven languages created for Anthony Gutierrez’ graphic novel The Lost Children. The name came pre-baked; I just added the -uvgöm ‘language of’ suffix.

2021: Nymeran /ˈnɪ.mə.rən/, (endonym Tlíl Nime [tlil ˈnɪmɛ] “Language of Nym” or Ní Tlíl [ni tlil] “Our Language”). I didn’t originally create this language or choose the name. The language was created by Niamh Doyle in 2015, and I believe the exonym existed even before that, created by Ray Chou and Vince Ferreiro, founders of MythWorks (formerly Mythopoeia) and creators of the comic Glow, taking place in the land of Nym where Nymeran is spoken. I’ve heard it called both / ˈnɪmərən/ and /naɪˈmiri.ən/, so do with that information what you will.

2021: Arbulian /ɑrˈbu.li.ən/ (endonym: Seprotu Baet [sɛˈpro.tu bäˈɛt] ‘our way of speaking’) The third language created for The Lost Children. The endonym is a little half-assed, I’ll admit; the exonym refers to the shadow realm of Arbul, where the deities who speak the language dwell in exile.

2021: Ashian (endonym: Kéðryňa [ˌkeːðˈrʏ.ɲa] ‘Language of the Kaede’) The fourth language created for The Lost Children: The Exonym was created by the author. The endonym is a little more roundabout: The author required that the name of the Ashian people contain certain sounds and be derived from a particular sequence of letters that had historical importance. That name ended up being Kéðaš, which, paired with the word for language, ʀýňa, gave the endonym Kéðryňa.

2022: Hakdor /ˈhæk.dor/ (endonym: Iuqilol (Taqetis) [juˈʤilol (taˈʤedis)] ‘The Language (of the Hakdor)’) The fifth language for The Lost Children, this language was a lot of fun to construct. The Hakdor are a genetically modified race of humanoids who do not think in quite the same abstract and symbolic terms that humans do. They are very literal and procedural, and that comes through in the language. The exonym was provided by the author; the endonym just means “the language” – itself a compound meaning “word-collection” – though it can be modified with Taqetis ‘of the Hakdor’ if further specification is necessary. The word Taqet ‘Hakdor’ had a particular meaning – maybe something that the Hakdor were called by the Alder’mane? I can’t remember – but I forgot to write it down and now it is lost forever.

2022: Braereth /ˈbraɪ̯.ərˌeθ/ (endonym: idem [ˈbrae̯.re̞θ]) I was approached by author CJ Kavanaugh to create a dialect or creole of French for The Chronicles of Braereth, a novel series she was writing, and after some initial discussions, we concluded that a dialect wasn’t quite right, and instead we would need a separate branch of Romance languages that should still be more or less intelligible to other Romance speakers, but didn’t “belong” to any particular area. She came up with the name Braereth (and I fiddled around with the spelling a bit). It is also the name of the Shadowland where it is spoken by a range of fairy-tale creatures. I created a Classical (extinct) dialect and a modern “official” dialect. We later added three additional dialects, which are not quite mutually intelligible: Tenibvreth /ˈtɛnɪvrɛθ/ (endonym: idem [teˈnivreθ] ‘Language of Darkness (Tenebres)’) spoken by Vampires, Eomentesa /eɪ̯(j)oʊ.mɛnˈtɛ.sə/ (endonym: idem [e̞.u.me̞nˈte̞.sa) ‘Elemental Langauge’) spoken by witches, and Merineth /ˈme.rə.nɛθ/ (endonym: idem [ma.riˈnit’] ‘Language of the Sea’) spoken by Mer-folk and Shapeshifters. The latter has some pretty dramatic sound changes that make it particularly unintelligible with the usual Romance crowd, but make it much easier to distinguish the sounds under water.

2022: Western (endonym: Nƛeňǰax [dɮeɲˈʥax]) The sixth language for The Lost Children. This one really took it out of me! I don’t think the name means anything specific – at least, if it does, I don’t remember and I didn’t write anything in the notes about it. Nƛe ňǰa means ‘the mysteriously unknowable red one’, so I’m pretty sure that’s not where it came from. I’m almost positive I just ginned up a word and declared it a name.

2022: Chardane. The seventh (and final… so far?) language for The Lost Children, spoken by a sort of sentient pack-animal with independently movable eye-stalks. This one is still under construction and currently paused while I finish other projects, so no endonym yet. The name Chardane was provided by the author.

2023: “Pulselang” – a sketch of a language created for B.A. Bellec’s 2023 Novel Pulse: Book Two, for which I will come up with a proper name if it becomes appropriate later on. I’m credited in the book with creating an “Alien Language,” but it’s really not from an alien source, which won’t be revealed until book 3: Stay tuned!

2023: Europic ~ Eulingo ~ Fauxperanto (endonym: Yevropicu [jev.roˈpi.ʃu] ‘Europese’) This is ostensibly a proto-language for a series of languages spoken about two millennia from the present. It is very Euro-centric, by design, but not quite as transparently as Esperanto (though it went by the code-name “Faux-speranto” for a while before I had really hammered out a lot of the details). There’s a short-term descendant / variety / dialect of it (intended to be) about 250 years after the original language that I’m calling, variously, “Vulgar European” or “Late Western Europic” which has an endonym of Ivropiho [iv.roˈpi.xo]. I didn’t intend for it to be a “separate” language, per se, but it’s gradually developing more of its own identity and may one day soon merit its own entry here.

2024: Ivropich ~ Proto-Human (endonym: Ivropich [ivroˈpiç]) This is a direct descendant of Europic and Vulgar European, above. While it is probably gauche to call something a “proto” language that has a documented direct ancestor, this refers to the in-world detail that this was the language spoken by a group of humans who left the Earth in the 26th century, so it is the first and only Terran language on the new planet. (NB: The time-line on this language is still shifting a little. There’s a descendant of Rupesh going under the code name “Arxippian” [i.e. what they speak on the arc-ship], but that name is definitely not going to stick, so I hesitate to mention much about it until it “congeals” a little more… stay tuned! There will also be two more stages of the language after Arxippian which have yet to be worked out.)

2024: Cwathah (endonym: Cwathah [kwaˈθaχ]) This is a personal a priori language I started playing around with just for the joy of my own heart. I wanted it to sound a bit like Welsh, but with a slightly simplified phonology (none of the orthographic gymnastics with ⟨w⟩ and ⟨y⟩, for example, and no ridiculous consonant clusters); the endonym is an initialism that stands for “Cymraeg Without All The Hootin’ And Hollerin’.” Being a private language, I doubt I’ll ever say much more about it than this, even if I do manage to develop it fully.

2025: [Redacted] (endonym: Þąkšva Iką [θãkˈɕva iˈkã]) A historical Indo-European a posteriori language set in a place I’m not allowed to mention for a “Project” I’m not allowed to talk about. After I’d spent a hundred or so hours working on it, they decided they didn’t actually want to use it or pay me for it, but I’m still not allowed to talk about it. It was quite good. Maybe I can salvage some of the more interesting parts of it and spin it up into something nice someday. This has probably been the final straw that has soured the idea of professional conlanging for me. I don’t think I’ll be doing much more of it unless the money is good and the people are decent.

2025: Delvish. In the fall of 2025 I was contracted to create three languages for author Shawn Amick for an upcoming novel. Delvish is the first and most complete. I don’t want to say much about these until the book comes out, probably later this year or early next.

2026: Volkarian. The second of three languages I created for Shawn Amick. 

2026: Maka’in. The third of three languages I created for Shawn Amick.

Wow, did you really just read all of that? Thanks, but why?

Friday, December 15, 2023

Lexember, Day 15: lencura

I have a lot of diachronic rearranging to do. 

I’ll try to remember to blog about it if I come up with anything particularly interesting. 

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!



Wednesday, December 13, 2023

Lexember, Day 13: ôtri

I’m having a bit of an existential crisis about the language today, rethinking a lot about how to tetris together the many 3D diachronic puzzle pieces that make up the language. Unfortunately, I don’t have time to unravel it all today, or in the foreseeable future, so in case you notice some inconsistencies, that’s probably why. 

Really, next year, any other month is probably better for this!

Anyway, in the meantime here’s a recycled word I created a few years ago that still holds up to scrutiny, and has some interesting stuff going on:


Lexember, Day 12: istêna, pethru

Today’s words are an example of something that happens quite often in mixed language and languages with strong influence from another: synonyms of the same word from different families. Usually over time such words take on narrower meanings as they attempt to “share” semantic space. 

In this case, while both have a base definition of ‘stone’, istêna often has a further connotation of a decorative or precious stone or mineral, while pethru is generally more of a common rock or stone on the ground or perhaps used for building; a bit like stone (a direct cognate of istêna) and rock, an early borrowing from Medieval Latin rocca, from an uncertain source (possibly from a Celtic or non-Indo-European language).



Monday, December 11, 2023

Lexember, Day 11: frêiu

This is a weird little word that trickled down from Germanic. It means ‘world’, but in an abstract sense not tied to the planet – the Earth itself is called Ṫerra. Frêiu is more like “the range of human experience.” Originally frêius carried only the meaning of ‘world’; it took on the secondary meaning of ‘people’ in the same way that French monde took on the same connotation, probably from an earlier tout le monde ‘everyone’ (compare: le monde entier ‘the whole world’). 

Interesting side-note: The Proto-Germanic word, *ferhwuz, also meant ‘oak tree’, and is related to the Latin quercus with the same meaning, hence the taxonomic genus.



Sunday, December 10, 2023

Lexember, Day 10: nôs, vôs

The plural pronouns in Gothic Romance are a busy set. In addition to the first person plurals, nôs (exclusive) and vôs (inclusive), there is also the second person plural iôs

Etymologically, nôs comes to us directly from Latin nōs via Romance Novelle and Bad Romance nos. Not many places to hide there! And iôs is only slightly less direct from Proto-Germanic *jūz via Griutungi *jūs, Old Valthungian iuvs, and Italian Gothic yous. Vôs, on the other hand, is a little trickier. It comes from Germanic *wīz via Griutungi *wīs and Old Valthungian vijs. With Italian Gothic and Bad Romance co-existing in close proximity, Bad Romance vos ‘you’ was quickly replaced by the Germanic form to avoid confusion, but the influence of the Romance pronouns caused the change in vowels to vôs from where we would normally expect **vês.

Each of these three plurals also has a dual variant: ioth ‘you two’ from Italian Gothic yoth, from Old Valthungian jut, unchanged from Proto-Germanic *jut; veth ‘you and I, we two’ from IG veth, from Old Valthungian vit, Griutungi *wit, and Proto-Germanic *wet. Finally there is neth, a dual pronoun innovated from the exclusive nôs, ‘the two of us’ – mostly only useful for couples referring to their significant others.

There are also oblique forms, such as second person dative plural iżus, or first person inclusive dative dual venqua, but those are for another day.

Thursday, December 7, 2023

Lexember, Day 07: iê, ieth, que

There are two important things to take away from today’s Lexember words. 

The first is the distinction between and ieth, which is etymologically vast, but for practical purposes is the same as the distinction between a and an in English, or knowing when to use le or l’ – or any other kind of liaison – in French. There are a lot of these sorts of words with alternate pre-vocalic forms, though this is the only one (so far) in which the two forms come from completely different sources.

The second important takeaway is that of the clausal versus phrasal conjunction. These are not interchangeable: and ieth must always be accompanied by a verb and join two clauses, while que connects two words in the same clause (usually nouns). It can help to think of and ieth as equivalent to “and then” while que is closer to “and also.”



Wednesday, December 6, 2023

Lexember, Day 06: cronu

I set out today to showcase and discuss a small but bigger-than-you’d-think class of words in Gothic Romance that can be traced back equally to Latin and Gothic. That is, their forms are similar enough and a few sound changes align in the right way that the resulting word would be the same ragardless of which branch it came from. This is compounded by the “word game” culture of the speakers of Bad Romance and Italian Gothic (which, as I’ve mentioned in previous posts, were spoken in tandem by mostly bilingual speakers in a small city in northern Italy from the 12th to the 17th century), where jocular swapping of the occasional vowel often gave rise to permanent hybrid forms (cf. voqua ‘water’). 

In addition to cronu, a few others are veru ‘man’ (cf. Latin vir, Gothic waír, both from PIE *wiHrós), ezja ‘her’ (cf. Latin ea, Gothic ija), dreombra ‘to dream’ (cf. Latin dormīre ‘to sleep’, Gothic dráumjan ‘to dream’), and lôgura (cf. Latin lavāre ‘to wash’, Gothic lauga ‘laundry’).

However, before I got through making the above panel for cronu, I went for a trip down the proverbial rabbit-hole, trying to figure out the best way to derive a deadjectival (adverbial) suffix (‘‑ly’). Romance languages pretty universally use the suffix ‑mente from Latin mēns ‘mind’, and while it has an interesting semantic history, it wasn’t where I wanted to go with Gothic Romance. Germanic languages are a little less uniform, but a plurality of them use some derivation of ‑līk, from ProtoGermanic līką ‘body’. Now, a reasonable person would just look for a good derivation of a word that means ‘way, manner’, and for a moment I almost used ‑mo, cf. modus, quomodo, &c. But at the last minute, it occurred to me that another merger was at hand: mēns ‘mind’, līką ‘body’ – the obvious bridge to that gap is ‘heart’. 

The word ‘heart’ itself is another mixed word, croth (cf. Latin cor, with a stem-final d that gets lost in the nominative, and Gothic haírtō), but I wanted it to remain a little bit removed from the sound shifts applying to the full word, so after some fiddling around I settled on ‑cre from an earlier ‑core.

Then there’s the use of the genitive where in Romance languages we might find the “partative de,” which I’ve been noodling around with, but haven’t used in practice yet. This brought up the issue of the declension itself. I don’t want Gothic Romance to go too heavy on the inflections, but I thought it would at least be funny to steal back the genitive plural suffix from Old Valthungian which stole it from Latin to begin with. Latin ‑ārum and ‑ōrum became  Old Valthungian ‑aaru and ‑ouru,  giving way to Italian Gothic ‑aro and eventually Gothic Romance ‑ro. So **cron‑ro, but n and r are mortal enemies in Gothic Romance, and a persistent rule instantly separates them with a buffer d, which is how we end up with crondro for ‘of the horns’.

If that’s not enough excitement for one day, there’s also the unusual choice of Latin solitus  for the base of ‘usual’, which, with an unstressed vowel deletion, becomes soltus, which is when I decided to make good on my ruminating over causing a shift of VlC → VuC. An intermediate **soutu in Early Gothic Romance easily gave way to sûtu, plus our new ‑cre ending and we have a nice word for ‘usually’ as well. 

And with that, I might still make it in by midnight!

Friday, April 10, 2020

R-stem nouns

A few days ago, I wrote a Word-of-the-Hrmm blurb about the r-stem noun tǣkra, and in it I had mentioned that the r-stems are a very rare noun class consisting of only eleven nouns in Valthungian. In Gothic, only four are attested: fadar ‘father’, swistar ‘sister’, brōþar ‘brother’, and dauhtar ‘daughter’. English has five, adding ‘mother’ to the list (which all attested Gothic had replaced with aiþei), but these aren’t a particularly special class, since noun stem classes don’t really exist in English anymore, though the irregular plural brethren is at least a hat-tip toward its r-stem past.

The r-stems as a class are unique in that they are, in a way, an actual noun class, consisting exclusively of close family members, rather than just a grammatical class based on stem configuration like the a-, i-, and u-stems. 
In Proto-Germanic there are seven nouns reconstructed as r-stems, though one of them, *aihtǣr, is not a family member, but means ‘owner’. The others are: *fadǣr, *mōdǣr, *brōþǣr, *swestǣr, *duhtǣr, and *þeuhtǣr, the last meaning ‘grandson’.

PGmc. Gothic Griutungi O.Val. M.Val. Val.
*brōþǣr brōþar *brōþar *brouðar brôðʀ brōðra ‘brother’
*duhtǣr dauhtar *dohtar *dohtar dꜵtʀ dǭtra ‘daughter’
*fadǣr fadar *fadar faðar faðʀ faðra ‘father’
*mōdǣr - *mōdar *mouðar môðʀ mōðra ‘mother’
*swestǣr swistar *swistar *swistar swistʀ swistra ‘sister’
*þeuhtǣr - *diuhtar *divhtar dzjûtʀ ǧūtra ‘grandchild’
- *þiuhtar *þivhtar þjûtʀ þjūtra ‘grandson’
- þjustʀ þjustra ‘granddaughter’
*taikuraz - *tǣkur *taekur tækʀ tǣkra ‘brother-in-law’
*swegrō swaihrō *swehrō *swehrou swæro swǣra ‘mother-in-law’
*swehuraz,
*swegraz
swaihra *swehra *swehra swæra swǣra ‘father-in-law’

The first anomaly on the winding path to Valthungian’s eleven r-stems: *þeuhtǣr ‘grandson’ came to have a parallel form of *deuhtǣr, probably a dialectal variant somewhere within East Germanic, or possibly even an early borrowing from West Germanic, but more likely an analogy with *duhtǣr ‘daughter’, as this latter form came to mean explicitly ‘granddaughter’. Around 1300ᴀᴅ, however, a new form of þjustʀ for ‘granddaughter’ was innovated in Middle Valthungian, likely an analogy with swistʀ ‘sister’, and *deuhtǣr – by this time dzjûtʀ - underwent an interesting change, being converted to a neuter noun and referring broadly to ‘grandchild’ of either sex. Nouns changing gender is very unusual – though not completely unheard-of in East Germanic – but in this case the change was logical and fairly unremarkable, as the masculine and feminine r-stem nouns had exactly the same declension, and the neuter pronoun was regularly used for plurals containing more than one gender. The only really odd thing about it is that it retains the nominative and accusative plural endings where we would normally expect no ending for the neuter. In modern Valthungian, this word may be found in any gender, as applicable.

Around the same time that Middle Valthungian þjūtʀ was giving rise to þjustʀ and dzjûtʀ was boldly defying the binary, the a-stem tækur ‘brother-in-law’ was being reanalyzed as an r-stem as well, speeding up the dropping of its unstressed vowel.

Finally, well into the age of Early Modern Valthungian, the other in-laws, now merged as swǣra, but initially with slightly different declensions, started losing some of their weak declensions to r-stem endings, possibly initially to avoid confusion during the era of “syllabic unpacking,” during which pretty much all Middle Valthungian endings containing a sonorant (m, n, r, or l) were suddenly bursting out in a flourish of vowels in occasionally unexpected places.

Structurally, the r-stems are distinguished by a few unique features. The nominative, dative, and accusative are all identical in the singular. The nominative plural shows i-umlaut in those which contain a vowel which can be umlauted. (NB: The vowels of þjūtris, þjustris, and ǧūtris are not umlauted, because they originally all come from the /iu/ diphthong which was not subject to umlaut.) The dative and accusative plurals are those of the u-stems. Finally the genitive plural shows a final –o (in Middle Valthungian –u), consistent with other genitive plurals bedecked with their new-found Latin affix, but rather than the full –aro (from –ārum) ending, only the –o carries through, perhaps because the r-stem made the rest feel redundant.

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.
‘brother’ brōðra brōðris brōðra brōðra brœuðris brōðro brōðrum brōðruns
‘daughter’ dǭtra dǭtris dǭtra dǭtra dœ̄tris dǭtro dǭtrum dǭtruns
‘father’ faðra faðris faðra faðra feðris faðro faðrum faðruns
‘mother’ mōðra mōðris mōðra mōðra mœuðris mōðro mōðrum mōðruns
‘sister’ swistra swistris swistra swistra swistris swistro swistrum swistruns
‘grandchild’ ǧūtra ǧūtris ǧūtra ǧūtra ǧūtris ǧūtro ǧūtrum ǧūtruns
‘grandson’ þjūtra þjūtris þjūtra þjūtra þjūtris þjūtro þjūtrum þjūtruns
‘granddaughter’ þjustra þjustris þjustra þjustra þjustris þjustro þjustrum þjustruns
‘brother-in-law’ tǣkra tǣkris tǣkra tǣkra tǣkris tǣkro tǣkrum tǣkruns
‘mother-in-law’ swǣra swǣris swǣra swǣra swǣris swǣro swǣrum swǣruns
‘father-in-law’ swǣra swǣris swǣra swǣra swǣris swǣro swǣrum swǣruns

The r-stems – and, indeed, most familial nouns in Valthungian – tend to be more highly specialized than English, most having some sort of indication of patrilineage. Among the above terms, *þeuhtǣr and all of its descendants, while they do translate to ‘grandchild’, all refer specifically to children of the son. The daughter’s children are all variants of aninkliþ. Also tǣkra fails to cover the entire semantic space of ‘brother-in-law’, referring only to the brother of one’s spouse, while the husband of one’s sibling is ǣðums.

For reference, here are some of the family members beyond the r-stems:
  • aunt, father’s sister: faða (ō-stem)
  • aunt, mother’s sister: mœuðria (jǭ-stem)
  • brother: brōðra (r-stem)
  • brother-in-law, sibling’s husband: ǣðums (a-stem), swigra-brōðra (r-stem) 
  • brother-in-law, spouse’s brother: tǣkra (r-stem), swigra-brōðra (r-stem) 
  • daughter: dǭtra (r-stem)
  • daughter-in-law: brūþs (i-stem), snuža (ō-stem) 
  • father: faðra (r-stem), āta (ô-stem)
  • father-in-law: swǣra (r-stem) 
  • grandfather, mother’s father: auga (ô-stem)
  • grandchild, daughter’s child: aninkliþ (a-stem, neuter)
  • grandchild, son’s child: ǧūtra (r-stem, neuter)
  • granddaughter, daughter’s daughter: aninkliði (į̄-stem)
  • granddaughter, son’s daughter: þjustra (r-stem)
  • grandfather, father’s father: ana (ô-stem)
  • grandmother, father’s mother: atna (ǭ-stem)
  • grandmother, mother’s mother: atma (ǭ-stem)
  • grandson, daughter’s son: aninkliþs (a-stem)
  • grandson, son’s son: þjūtra (r-stem)
  • mother: mōðra (r-stem), ǣði (į̄-stem) 
  • mother-in-law: swǣra (r-stem) 
  • nephew, brother’s son: sūtruǧa (jô-stem)
  • nephew, sister’s son: niva (ô-stem)
  • niece, brother’s daughter: nift (i-stem)
  • niece, sister’s daughter: nifča (jô-stem)
  • sister: swistra (r-stem)
  • sister-in-law, sibling’s wife: swigra-swistra (r-stem) 
  • sister-in-law, spouse’s sister: swigra-swistra (r-stem) 
  • son: sunus (u-stem)
  • son-in-law: mēǧ (a-stem) 
  • uncle, father’s brother: faðruǧa (jô-stem)
  • uncle, mother’s brother: augahǣms (a-stem)

Friday, April 3, 2020

WotM Valthungian: tǣkra

Tǣkra [ˈte̞ːkrɑ] n. brother-in-law; spouse’s brother.

Edit: The genitive plural in the image should be tǣkro. That’s what you get for automation!

Saturday, March 7, 2020

WotM Valthungian: agiþǣša

I’d like to start posting a regular “Word-of-the-Day,” but I’m still getting settled on a decent format to use. Actually, it will be more of a “Word-of-the-Moment,” because I know I’m not disciplined enough to put something up consistently every day.

Please bear with me while I get some of the technical stuff sorted out and figure out the best way to post and keep this updated! In the meantime, here’s the first take:

Monday, June 2, 2014

Historical Linguistics for Kids!

Dear Aubrey,

Your mom tells me you’ve been wondering about where words come from.  I’ve spent years and years learning where different words come from, so I hope I can help.

Words have been around as long as humans have, and maybe even longer!  They’re now discovering that Neanderthals (the cavemen that were here before modern humans) probably used some words as well, but because of the way their mouths were shaped, they couldn’t pronounce a lot of the same sorts of words we can.  They were only able to make what are called “high front vowels,” which are sounds like “ee” and “ay,” so they could probably say “bee” and “bay,” but they couldn’t say “bow” or “boo” or “bah.”  But anyway, if they did say any words, they aren’t the same words we have today.

Nobody really knows if all the languages the people speak today came from the same language, or if different groups of people started talking and different language families sprang up in different places. The trouble is, we can’t tell much at all about language before about ten thousand years ago, and scientists think that people have been talking for at least about forty thousand years – maybe even a lot longer than that!  People probably started using simple words to communicate with each other for hunting, and a lot of the earliest words probably sounded similar to a noise that that word made.  For example, the word for a bear might have been a roaring or growling sound, or the word for wind might have been a whooshing sound.  

Most of the words we use in English today come from a language called “Proto-Indo-European.”  This is a language that was spoken about six or seven thousand years ago in the area north of the Black Sea, probably in what today is a country called Ukraine.  (Ask your mom to show you where this is on a map!)  The IndoEuropeans were some of the first people to ride horses.  With horses, they were able to travel a lot further than people had been able to before, so they moved to lots of new places, west into almost all of Europe, and south into what is now Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, and India.

As they spread out over Europe and Asia, different areas started to talk a little bit differently from one another, just like people from different places in this country have different accents.  At first, they could probably still understand each other, just like we can understand people from the South, or from England or Australia, or from Maine or Boston, or even from Minnesota!  But before too long, they couldn’t understand each other very well anymore, just like we might have a hard time understanding people from far northern Scotland. (They speak a language called Scots, which is a lot like English, but not always quite enough to understand!)

After about five thousand years, they spoke a lot of different languages, like Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, and a language we call Proto-Germanic.  Your mom said she’s told you a little bit about Latin, and that’s one of the places we get a lot of our words from – particularly if they’re big words!  We also get a lot of words from Greek, especially the ones that have to do with science, because a lot of our science started with the ancient Greeks.  But most of the common words we use in English come from Proto-Germanic. 

Just like IndoEuropean started to split into a lot of different languages, all of the languages it split up into did the same thing.  Even today, languages are changing and splitting up and becoming new languages. Languages never stay the same for very long; in fact, English has even changed a lot since your mom and I were kids! 

Latin spread out from Italy with the Roman Empire about two thousand years ago, and blended with a lot of the languages in neighboring countries.  In the north-west, Latin mixed with a Celtic language called “Gaulish,” which is kind of like Irish, but it was spoken in France, and that mix of Latin and Gaulish eventually became French!  Further south, Latin mixed with another Celtic language called “Iberian,” and also mixed in a little bit of Arabic and Gothic (a Germanic language!), and became Spanish and Portuguese. To the east of Rome, Latin mixed with Slavic languages (kind of like Russian) and turned into a language called Romanian.  Latin also changed over time and eventually became Italian. *(Sort of.  The history of the evolution of Romance languages is very complicated, and there’s a lot more to it than this!)

Anyway, ProtoGermanic also broke up into different languages.  At first it broke up into three groups of dialects.  A dialect is sort of like an accent, or a language that’s spoken a little differently from one place to another.  The three dialects were called East, West, and North Germanic. 

East Germanic eventually turned into a language we call Gothic, because it was spoken by people called Goths.  The Goths eventually conquered Rome and brought some of that language into Spanish and Portuguese too, along with the Latin and Iberian they already had. (The Arabic words in Spanish came later.)

North Germanic was spoken by the Vikings, and eventually this became a language known as Old Norse or Old Icelandic.   Just like the IndoEuropeans had horses that helped them move around a lot more quickly, the Vikings had huge ships that let them bring their language all around the coasts of Europe and even as far as back to the Black Sea where IndoEuropean started thousands of years before!  They also brought some of their words to northern France, where they were called the “North-men,” but they couldn’t make the “th” sound in French, so that part of France is now called “Normandy.” That’s also where we get the name “Norman,” and the French people from this area came to be known as the Normans.  Old Norse is still spoken today in Iceland, where it is called Icelandic, even though it’s pronounced a little bit differently.

Finally, West Germanic also split into two different groups: Sometimes they’re called “high” and “low” German (but this isn’t what we call German today).  They were called this because “High German” was spoken around the Alps, which are very high mountains.  “Low German” was spoken along the coast of Germany and Denmark and Holland which was much lower.  The Low Germans were known as the Saxons. There’s still a state in Germany today called “Saxony.”  Another group lived in a weird little crooked part of the coast in Denmark which was shaped like a fish hook.  Because of the angle in the coast-line, they said they were from the Angle.  They were also good ship-builders like the Vikings, and along with a third group called the Jutes, the Angles and the Saxons set sail across the North Sea, and when they landed, they kept the name “Angle” and they called the country they landed in “Angle-land,” which we now call “England.”

About 1,500 years ago, these Anglo-saxons (which was the name given to the Jutes, Saxons, and Angles who landed in England) spoke a language which we call “Old English,” (but since it wasn’t very old to them, they just called it English).  (Actually, they called it Ænᵹlısc, and it didn’t look or sound very much like English sounds today!)  But they weren’t in England for very long before the Vikings stopped there too, and conquered the country!  A lot of Old Norse words got added to English (like “husband” and “wisk” and “skirt” and “drag”).  In fact, almost any word in English with a “sk” sound probably came from Old Norse, because in Old English, this sound always turned into a “sh” sound.  We even have some words that come from the same ProtoGermanic word, but some we get from Old English and some from Old Norse, like “skirt” and “shirt, or “drag” and “draw.”

The English fought back and took over again, and they ended up adding a lot of their words to Old Norse, like “boat”!  They went back and forth like this for a few hundred years.  Then about a thousand years ago, in the year 1,066, they were invaded from the other side of the country by the other ex-Vikings (Normans) who had decided to settle down and become French.  This is where we really start to get a lot of neat words in the English that we speak today.

The people living in England were still speaking the same old language they’d been speaking all along, but now their king and most of the nobility spoke French.  The English who lived in the villages didn’t know much of anything about being kings, and the French who invaded the country didn’t know much of anything about farming, so something very strange happened, and we get a weird group of words in English that don’t exist in most other languages!  The courtiers loved eating lots of meat from the farm, but they never saw any of the animals the meat came from.  So when they wanted a particular kind of meat, they would ask for that animal in French. Meanwhile, the people who raised the animals only knew them by their Old English names.  So they would ask for “bœuf,” the word for a cow, which then was pronounced like “bafe,” which later became “beef.”  Pig was “porc,” which became pork; chicken was “poulet,” which later became “poultry;” sheep was “mouton,” which became mutton, and so on.  English is one of the only languages where the names for kinds of meat are different than the names of the animals the meat came from!

Anyway, this mixture of Old English and French gradually became what we call “Middle English.”  Of course, just like with Old English, they just called it “English” at the time.  Later on, during what’s called the Renaissance, we added a lot of Latin and Greek words to the language as we started learning more about the knowledge that had been lost before the Middle Ages (which is another language story altogether!) 

There was also something that happened called the Great Vowel Shift.  This happened in part because the plague that was sweeping through Europe was forcing people to move around quite a lot, and people from all over England were coming together in London who spoke very different dialects of English.  At first they couldn’t all understand each other very well, but eventually something happened called “levelling,” and the language changed to one that was very regular that they could all understand pretty well.  What happened in the Great Vowel Shift was something called “Vowel Raising.” (This is a little hard to understand, and maybe a little boring, so you can skip this part if you like.)

If you draw a map of the shape of your mouth and put on that map all the different places where we say vowels, it looks something like this:

i              u
e              o
ɛ              ɔ
a

Since these aren't quite the same as the sounds of the letters you've been learning up until now, if you click on each letter it will take you to a page where you can listen to what each one sounds like.

In the Great Vowel Shift, each of these letters moved up by one, and the top letters, i and u, turned into double-vowels (called diphthongs, but there’s no reason for you to know that word before you’re 20!) which are written phonetically “ai” (pronounced like “eye”) and “au” (pronounced like “ow!”) I can teach you more about this later on if you like, but the point is that the language that everyone spoke after the Great Vowel Shift is pretty close to the language we call English today. This is the language that Shakespeare wrote in, and even though the style he wrote in sounds kind of old, and some of the words mean different things today, the words were pronounced pretty much the same.

Since then we’ve borrowed a lot of other words in English from a lot of different languages. A lot of other languages have also borrowed a lot of other words from English.  In fact, there’s a language called Tok Pisin which is made up of almost entirely English words, but it’s not English.

Anyway, that’s pretty much where words come from.  If there’s any more that you want to know about, please ask me, and I’ll do my best to answer!

Love,

Uncle Jamin